Workplace...

There were 3 sites (A, B & C). Site A got 2 person (A1 & A2), site B got 1 person (B1) and site C got 2 person (C1 & C2) also. Site A is a back office with big bosses around, site B is a back office while site C is a front office with a few bosses around. In terms of importance and critical, both site A and C is the same. A1, B1 & C1 is more experienced and had work in the respective sites longer than A2 & C2. Whenever A1 is on leave or mc, B1 is ask to cover for the duty there and ask C2 to cover site B. But when C1 is on leave or mc, any standby person (unfamiliar with the sites) is ask to cover for it, just for the sake of making the headcount.

Does that mean A2 cant handle the site alone with any standby person available and need a more familiar person to help out? Or they think too high up for C2??

"Success is the sum of small efforts, repeated day in and day out."